As we’ve discussed in past blog entries, there are smart student characteristics that are common to all disciplines and all grade levels, and there are some characteristics that indicate strength in a given discipline.
In reading, for example, there are a number of variables that determine whether or not a student will develop as a “proficient” reader. This is a critical list for teachers, not only in language arts but in all disciplines, because reading is the only discipline tested in every content area.
A brief summary of these characteristics is included in the chart below.
Characteristics Required for Proficiency in Reading | Current Tools Available | Usable in Regular School Setting | Usable in VI or NTI Setting | Priority |
Mastery of initial decoding and reading skills | ||||
A positive attitude about reading | ||||
A positive perception of self as reader | ||||
Success at grade level reading for inference or conclusion | ||||
Success in grade level purposeful reading to perform a task (e.g., to learn, critique, etc.) | ||||
Mastery of grade level literary concepts and their uses | ||||
Success in grade level appropriate literary criticism/analysis | ||||
Successful grade level recognition and analysis of required genre | ||||
Successful linkage of critical and creative thinking to reading | ||||
Mastery of appropriate “reading” and “literature” critical vocabularies | ||||
Successful work in all reading assessment formats and venues | ||||
Successful transfer of reading to real-world reading tasks |
In a standards-based world, especially with the high-stakes accountability assessment in place, writing off the student as a poor reader without identifying the particular point of breakdown and cause of the breakdown will probably be considered an inefficient or ineffective teaching practice.
State assessments and transitions to the next level will both require students who have mastered reading at their grade level. Support systems will need to be developed for a wide variety of students (e.g., the student who is proficient at reading literature but can’t read a science text or a math question). Reading and thinking are the two truly universal disciplines that all students must master, which means that all teachers have a responsibility for building reading competency.
About Post Author
Frank Desensi
Frank DeSensi is the founder and Chief Innovation Officer of Educational Directions, LLC. which consults with schools and school districts in the southeastern and mid-western United States. A retired educator, Frank spent 35 years in a variety of teaching and administrative positions. He taught at the university, college, secondary, and middle-school levels; worked in the central office as a curriculum specialist; and held both principal and assistant principal positions. From 1993 to 1998, Frank served as a Kentucky Distinguished Educator, helping to turn around schools that were labeled in decline or in crisis under the provisions of the Kentucky Education Reform Act. Frank helped develop the STAR training program for new DE’s and served as a trainer in the Kentucky Leadership Academy. He jointly holds patents for three data-management systems for schools.