In the 1990s the Kentucky education Reform Act (KE RA) establish a cohort of “distinguished educators” (DE) who were assigned to underperforming schools to assist or actually take over and run schools that were underperforming on the state assessment. In the early days the DEs found they had to invest time in getting teachers to understand the purpose of the state tests and help them make sense of the state district and school performance reports.
In one session three DE’s were working with leadership teams from 30 schools. In those days the schools could copy the student work and review it to determine what the students could and could not do on the test. In the review of the test and some of the student work that they did to prepare for the workshop they discovered that one extended response question (thereafter known as the infamous “bug” question) had been particularly challenging with large numbers of students scoring 0 or 1 on the question. In one school only one student had scored above a 1 on the question.
In the workshop the DE’s decided to start the workshop by giving the “bug” question to the participants and ask them to write an answer. The plan was to have them use the state rubric to grade the answers that were generated as a first step in analyzing student work. When they scored the teachers’ answers they found that almost 60% of the teachers scored a 0 or 1. At this point the plan for the rest the workshop came apart as they set out analyze the teacher answers to determine why so many teachers missed the question. The analysis of the teacher work indicated that all the teachers had written thoughtful responses but a large number of them had written a thoughtful response to the wrong question. In the discussion that followed, it was decided that the teachers had done an impulsive read (point of breakdown) of the question and missed key elements of the state rubric. Further analysis showed that the school teams hadn’t taken the question seriously – cause of breakdown – (it was only third grade question after all). When the DE’s worked with the teachers and analyzed the student work they found out that students had done exactly the same thing (in one school every one of their 60% who scored below the 2 level had written decent answers but to the wrong question and according the state rubric could not receive a 2, 3, or 4. At the end of the workshop we asked the leadership teams what they learned the most common response was “we have to teacher students to read” while a significant number added “we have to teach our teachers to read”.
The three DEs spent the next two years trying to convince other DE’S and the school leadership teams and teachers that reading the test and not traditional “reading curricula” was a priority issue that schools had to address. By the mid-90s others were trying to deal with the problem. One national organization it even added a “test as genre” strand to their school improvement program.
What Is a “Genre”?
Genres are not simply categories or labels; they are constructs that represent different approaches to communicate information, ideas, or feelings. Whether it’s a poem, a letter, a short story or a scientific report, each genre operates within a set of conventions—structures, formats, and styles—that guide both authors and audiences.
Tests as a Genre: Defining Features
Tests, too, are a genre: they are crafted with particular intentions, follow distinct rules, and communicate in a language shaped by their function. Tests are more than a collection of questions. They are purposeful communicative acts, designed to elicit specific responses, measure defined skills, and signal knowledge or proficiency. This distinctiveness emerges in several ways:
- Purpose: Tests are created to evaluate, not just to inform or entertain. The fact that the reader is responsible for responding “proficiently” as defined by the question rubric shapes every aspect of the question design.
- Audience: the audience is a test-taker who is expected to read and then respond in a thoughtful way that will demonstrate their “proficiency” or mastery of the content and task embedded in the question.
- Structure and Format: Tests follow strict conventions with venue, duration, format, language, and level of rigor all dictated by the assessment’s purpose and subject. This ensures that the reader response will provide an accurate measure of student proficiency.
- Language and Discourse: Tests employ a specialized lexicon and syntax. Often dense and rule-bound enable writers to minimize ambiguity and maximize clarity.
The Conventions of Test Communication
Like any genre, tests operate within a shared set of expectations:
Format and Organization
Tests typically unfold in carefully segmented sections, each targeting a particular skill or knowledge domain. This segmentation is a communicative cue: it signals to the respondent what kind of thinking is required. Consider the difference between a reading comprehension passage followed by direct questions, versus a math section filled with equations and diagrams. Each section creates its own micro-genre within the broader test format.
Explicit Instructions
Instructions in tests are rarely optional or vague. They are written with precision, employing verbs like “circle,” “underline,” “explain,” or “compare.” These directives guide the respondent’s actions, ensuring that responses fit the designer’s expectations.
Question Types
every discipline tested Develop Test using question type data the discipline wants to collect on student to evaluate their progress toward efficiency. This reason every test has its own menu of question genres, each with unique conventions:
- Multiple-choice: Presents a stem and options, demanding selection rather than construction of response.
- Short answer: Requires concise, factual recall and a brief written explanation.
- Essay: requires extended discourse, argumentation, or synthesis, usually within a prescribed format (introduction, body, conclusion).
- Matching/True-False: Engages recognition skills, relying on binary logic.
- Technology enhanced: integrate reading, thinking, and technology use to communicate the answer
- hybrid: include visual- maps, diagrams, charts and graphs, etc. – that must be read and related to both any text provided and to the rubric embedded in the question
the question types vary from state to state and are usually defined in state test information packet as “assessment specifications”. In one state when teachers “unpacked” the assessment expectations for the state reading test they found the following information:
| Reporting Category | Genre | Percentage of Assessment | Indications of Rigor |
| Key ideas and details | Literature | 15-25% | Reading selections may include grade level selections that include from 300- 800 wordsVariety of testing formats will be used including electronic formatsReadings will be on grade level and will include discipline specific language in test promptsQuestion values were determined by the rigor and difficulty of the questions |
| Informational | |||
| Craft and structure | Literature | 25-35% | |
| Informational | |||
| Integration of knowledge and ideas | Literature | 20-30% | |
| Informational | |||
| Language and editing: Evaluating correct errorsUse grammar rules such as capitalization, punctuation and spellingLanguage use and conventions | Literature or Informational | 15-25% |
A sample test provided by the state gave the team an idea of the frequency of use of various types of questions that would be found on the state formal assessment.
| Number of Test Items | Types of Test Items |
| 20 | Selectable Hot Text – 2 |
| Evidence-Based Selected Response [EBSR] – 4 | |
| Graphic Response Display (GRID) – 3 | |
| Multiple-Choice – 3 | |
| Multiple Select – 1 | |
| Open Response – 1 | |
| Drag-and-Drop Hot Text – 1 | |
| Editing Task Choice – 3 | |
| Editing Task – 1 |
Each question type communicates differently and expects distinct forms of engagement, effort, and response. One of the student- support conventions in test writing is the inclusion of a rubric purpose and nature of the “proficient” response expected.
Expectations are Embedded in Tests
Tests communicate not only through their questions, but also through the expectations they set:
Precision and Clarity
Unlike narrative or conversational genres, tests require and reward precision. The expected response is often one that is direct, unambiguous, and demonstrably aligned with the rubric. Generosity of interpretation is rare; the genre values exactness.
Time Constraints
Most tests are time-bound, embedding urgency into the communicative act. This expectation shapes student responses, often rewarding speed and efficiency over deep thinking and nuance.
Standardized Language
theoretically state test require standardized critical vocabulary and phrasing, both in questions and expected answers. There’s little room for creative deviation—students are rewarded for conforming to the language and logic of the test.
Impersonal Tone
Test language is typically impersonal, avoiding colloquialisms, idioms, or emotional appeals. The genre calls for objectivity and detachment.
The Language of Tests: Specialized Discourse
Perhaps the most defining feature of tests as a genre is their language. In crafting questions, test designers draw upon a lexicon that differs markedly from everyday speech or even other academic writing.
Key Characteristics of Test Language
- Directness: Questions are straightforward, avoiding ambiguity.
- Operational Verbs: Words like analyze, synthesize, define, illustrate, infer, and justify populate test questions, each carrying specific cognitive demands.
- Structured Syntax: Sentences are often short, declarative, and formulaic (“Choose the best answer,” “Explain why…”).
- Minimal Context: Background information is provided only as needed, with explicit relevance to the question.
- Logical Connectors: Tests use connectors like “if,” “then,” “because,” “except,” and “however” to frame conditions and guide reasoning.
- Many states embed local culture, geography, and history in questions to create a comfortable “worldview” environment.
Why Recognizing Tests as a Genre Matters
When teachers see tests as a genre—as a distinct mode of communication—they gain valuable insight into the real curricula expected of students. Students are required to more than “know”. They are required to demonstrate a number of core proficiencies above and beyond the concept base of the different disciplines.
When teachers understand the nature of the testing genre they can be more precise in identifying the point of breakdown and the cause of breakdown in student work is not considered proficient. For example, Students may be fluent in the content but inexperienced with the genre conventions of tests and underperform on the test not because they didn’t know because they didn’t know how to answer the questions. Recognizing and explicitly teaching these conventions can demystify the test-taking process and enable more students to reach their potential as learners and test takers.
Empowering Students
By highlighting the conventions of test communication, teachers equip students with tools to decode instructions, recognize common question structures, and understand what kind of language is required in responses. This approach transforms test-taking from a mysterious ordeal into a transparent interaction. The goal for teachers is not to cover content to create confident and competent learners who can approach assessment confidently and competently. A great part of this involves attitude and perception which can be developed by including test as genre as a part of the curriculum in every discipline
Designing Better Assessments
Teachers who understand the genre can design more effective and equitable assessments. They can clarify instructions, avoid cultural or linguistic bias in question wording, and ensure that the language matches the abilities and backgrounds of their students. They can build to enable teachers to not only score test to use the test to determine the point at which students work broke down and begin the identification and remediation of the cause of breakdown.
Supporting Diverse Learners
For English language learners and students with diverse backgrounds, the test genre can be especially opaque. Explicit instruction in test conventions and language can close achievement gaps and foster greater inclusion. There are a number of strategies in “Limited English” programs that support student reading is critical for ensuring student progress that these strategies include reading the test proficiently.
Practical Strategies for Teachers
How can teachers help students recognize and master the test genre?
Genre Awareness Activities
- task analysis: include task analysis as a part of the thinking strand in every discipline and make it a required prerequisite to planning an answer and responding.
- Sample Analysis: Present students with sample test questions and ask them to identify conventions: What is the format? What are the expectations? What kind of language is used?
- Explicit Instruction: Teach the “genre rules” of tests just as you would teach the structure of a poem or the logic of a persuasive essay.
- Test Wiseness: teaching students strategies related to test taking efficiency and precision. Mastering strategies helps build confidence and competence.
- Practice Decoding: Give students opportunities to rewrite test questions in their own words, highlighting key verbs and logical connectors.
- Response Modeling: Show exemplary responses and break down why they work—how they match the language, format, and expectations of the question.
- Peer Review: Let students evaluate each other’s answers for genre conformity, offering feedback on clarity, precision, and language.
- Review and revision: after the first weeks of school build a culture of proficiency by asking all students (first in small groups then individually) to review their work and if it is not proficient in terms of the rubric required to work until it is proficient.
Reflection and Metacognition
one of the characteristics of the proficient learner is independent thinking and acting. Students who are dependent whether it’s on their teacher or on their location will frequently underperform their potential. Encouraging students to reflect on their own test-taking strengths and weaknesses can help them focus on supportive strategies and build their own test improvement plan. This encouragement can take many forms
- what types of questions are easy and which are challenging?
- Can they identify the different types of questions?
- Is the language of the test same as the language of the classroom and the teacher made tests? Is this a problem
- what test -wise and strategies are most helpful?
This metacognitive approach builds independence and confidence.
Conclusion: Towards Genre-Savvy Teaching
In today’s education, communication takes many forms: essays, dialogues, multimedia presentations, and, perhaps most rigorously, tests. Yet, too often, assessments are viewed merely as measures of learning, not as distinct acts of communication with their own conventions, expectations, and language. For teachers seeking to foster deep understanding, recognizing tests as a unique genre—a structured and rule-bound mode of discourse—can transform both their instruction and their students’ learning experiences.
By shifting perspective and recognizing tests as a distinct genre of communication, teachers unlock new pathways for student understanding and success. Tests are not just hurdles—they are structured conversations, with meaning and governed by rules. When students grasp these conventions and expectations, they transition from mere responders to strategic communicators. In embracing the genre of tests, teachers foster a classroom culture where assessment is not a mystery, but a skill to be mastered, understood, and ultimately, demystified. It is a critical part of the school’s mission of making all students successful.
About Post Author
